site stats

Ganesh bhavan patel v. state of maharashtra

WebHe relied on the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of Ganesh Bhavan Patel and Anr. v. State of Maharashtrareported in 1979 Cri.LJ. 51 and the judgments of this Court in the cases of Popat Balu Vanjari v. State of Maharashtraand The State of Maharashtra v. Wafati Babu Qureshi and Ors. reported in 1997 All MR (Cri) 518. WebHowever, Ganesh Bhavan Patel V. State of Maharashtra, is an authority for the proposition that delay in recording of statements of the prosecution witnesses under Section 161 of the Cr. P. C, although those witnesses were or could be available for examination when the investigating officer visited the Nikita Gadgil 8/12 ::: Uploaded on - 18/09 ...

Pramod Mahto vs State Of Bihar on 31 July, 2002 - Indian Kanoon

WebIn this context it would be useful to refer to the observations of Their Lordships of the Apex Court in paragraph 15 and 18 of the judgment Ganesh Bhawan Patel v. State of Maharashtra, which are to the following effect : "15 ..... WebJul 24, 2015 · All three accused are said to have run away from the place then, leaving their bicycles behind. Manilal was removed to the..., Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra 1979 2 SCR 94 to which one of us (Sarkaria, J.) was party, it was also observed: [SCC p. 376: SCC (Cri) p. ... psp turns on then shuts off https://urbanhiphotels.com

Ajit Savant Majagvai v. State Of Karnataka - Casemine

WebIn this regard, he relied upon the pronouncement of the Apex Court in the case of Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra, . Highlighting the same, he further contended that even though the police were aware of the incident much earlier to 9'0 clock as the police station is hardly one forlong away from the Crime seene, non action on the ... WebThe witness was proceeding towards his office situated in Bhaveshwar Nagar, Building No 3 in the third street, on Mahatma Gandhi Road. When he in his car came in front of the … WebSTATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ..RESPONDENT(S) 1 WWW.LIVELAW.IN LL 2024 SC 614. J U D G M E N T M. R. Shah, J. 1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied … horsetooth hot sauce bloody mary mix

State Of Maharashtra vs Priya Sharan Maharaj & Ors on 11 …

Category:Anil Sainath Choudhari vs The State Of Maharashtra on 17 …

Tags:Ganesh bhavan patel v. state of maharashtra

Ganesh bhavan patel v. state of maharashtra

Lalita Kumari v State of UP - So in this scenario, we really have ...

WebApr 28, 1992 · State Of Rajasthan (33) (3), Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra (4) and Lala Ram v. State of U.P (5). (6) The learned public prosecutor duly supported the conviction and sentence under challenge. He contended that the FIR Ex. P/1 was lodged within two hours and 5 minutes of the occurrence when the Police Station was at a …

Ganesh bhavan patel v. state of maharashtra

Did you know?

Webpetitioner: ganesh bhavan patel & anr. vs. respondent: state of maharashtra date of judgment18/10/1978 bench: sarkaria, ranjit singh bench: sarkaria, ranjit singh … WebGanesh Bhavan Patel & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 18 October, 1978. Citedby 1 docs Ram Kishan And Ors. vs The State Of Rajasthan on 8 May, 2007. Tuesday vs By Advs.Dr.K.P.Kylasanatha ... on 25 January, 2003 ... Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra (1984) 58 Cut LT 101, Smt. Dhare Dei v. Prafulla Swain and , Babu Lodhi v.

WebIt is well settled that the appellate Court should be slow in disturbing the finding of fact of the trial Court, and, even if two views are reasonably possible, it is not expected to interfere simply because it feels that it would have taken a different view if the case had been tried by it (See: : Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra.). 10. WebApr 28, 2024 · Ganesh Bhavan Patel & Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 18 October, 1978. Section 34 in The Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973. ... It has been held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra, reported in (1978) 4 SCC 371 in paragraphs 15 and 47, which read as under:

WebSee ( 1978) 4 SCC 371 : A.I.R 1979 Supreme Court 135 1 ( Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra ). 4. Before concluding we may in passing mention that the sale in the instant case was of 18th January 1972 i.e over 16 years ago. The acquittal order is of 12th May 1980 over eight years ago. 5. WebPETITIONER: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA Vs. RESPONDENT: PRIYA SHARAN MAHARAJ & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/03/1997 BENCH: G.N. RAY, G.T. NANAVATI ACT: HEADNOTE: JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T NANAVATI Leave granted. Heard the learned counsel. On 11.5.91, one Purushottam Wasudeo Deshpande lodged a complaint …

WebDec 4, 2012 · 45. Learned counsel for Surajit Sarkar relied upon Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra, (1978) 4 SCC 371 to contend that the delayed examination of PW …

WebAug 14, 1997 · State of Tripura 1986 1 SCC 549; Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1979 SC 135; Awadhesh v. State of M.P [1988 2 SCC 557 = 1988 3 SCR 513]; Anokh Singh v. State of Punjab 1992 Supp 1 SCC 426; Gajanan Amrut Gaykwad v. State of Maharashtra 1995 Supp 3 SCC 607; Ram Kumar v. State Of Haryana. horsetooth hiking coloradoWebSep 23, 1993 · In (1978) SCC 371 : ( AIR 1979 SC 135) (Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra). The Apex Court was pleased..., AIR 1976 SC 975 (Bhagrith v. horsetooth hot saucesWebLearned counsel relying on the said case of Jaggo (supra) as also another case of the judgment of this Court in Ganesh Bhavan Patil and Another v. State of Maharashtra, submitted that non-mentioning of the names of PWs 1 and 5 in the FIR and delay in examining the said witnesses makes the presence of these eye witnesses doubtful. It is … horsetooth homes for saleWebMar 31, 2024 · In Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra [(1978) 4 SCC 371: AIR 1979 SC 135] the eye witnesses to the crime proper was examined with a delay of one day. Though the delay of a few hours may not by itself constitute a serious infirmity, that there are concomitant circumstances which suggest that the investigator was deliberately marking ... horsetooth hiking trails fort collinsWebFeb 8, 2005 · State Of M.P 2004 1 SCC 414) 19. The High Court has placed reliance on a decision of this Court in Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra 1978 4 SCC 371. A bare reading of the fact situation of that case shows that the delayed examination by IO was not the only factor which was considered to be determinative. psp twisted metal isoWeb6. Reliance is also placed on the decision of Supreme Court in Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra - wherein was held that "delay of a few hours, simpliciter, in recording the statements of eye witnesses may not, by itself, amount to a serious infirmity in the prosecution case. But it may assume such a character if there are concomitant ... horsetooth hiking trails openWebAug 14, 1997 · State of Tripura 1986 1 SCC 549; Ganesh Bhavan Patel v. State of Maharashtra AIR 1979 SC 135; Awadhesh v. State of M.P [1988 2 SCC 557 = 1988 3 … horsetooth inn