Web7 feb. 2024 · David McClean and others v Andrew Thornhill KC. Allegations of professional negligence made against leading tax silk Andrew Thornhill KC were dismissed by the High Court in March 2024. The case will return to court for a three-day appeal in March 2024. Court of Appeal for three days from 20 th March. 4 New Square Chambers’ Roger … WebTaxing Issues – The Impact of The Thornhill Case 31/03/22. In this case note, Simon Howarth QC discusses the recent case of McLean v Thornhill and considers the wider implications of this important judgment, both in the context of claims arising out of failed tax schemes and more generally. You can read the full case below.
McClean & Ors v Thornhill [2024] EWHC 457 (Ch) - Casemine
WebWilliam Glassey, partner at Herbert Smith Freehills (while a partner at his previous firm Mayer Brown) acted for the successful defendant Andrew Thornhill QC and analyses the recent decision. Sign in or take a trial to read the full analysis. Web25 mrt. 2024 · In the latest claim concerning tax schemes David McClean and Others v Andrew Thornhill QC [2024] EWHC 457, the High Court has held that an eminent barrister who provided advice in the early 2000’s to the scheme promoters did not owe a duty of care to the investors to whom his advice had been made available by the promoters. rman list backup summary columns
Professional Negligence Decision in Favour of A Thornhill QC
Web13 apr. 2024 · In David McClean and others v Andrew Thornhill QC (2024), the claimants had been participants in a tax avoidance scheme that failed. The claim failed at the first … Web1904-9-21. mercredi 21 septembre 1904. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec. Montréal (Québec) :The Herald Publishing Company,1899-1914. mercredi 21 septembre 1904, Journaux, Montréal (Québec) :The Herald Publishing Company,1899-1914. [" FOR LITTLE WANTS Use Herald Want Columna.é AL OF Bu.\u201cTS ROUND .-. Web1 nov. 2024 · Barrister owed no duty to scheme investors for tax advice to promoters (McClean v Thornhill) Dispute Resolution analysis: This decision will be of interest to professional liability insurers, legal practitioners, and litigation funders, particularly those involved in claims against tax lawyers. rman list incarnation