WebJun 29, 2006 · Answer: I am guessing that you are aware of the general issue with these passages. As it says in your Bible margin, neither Mark 16:9-20 nor John 8:1-11 are in the oldest and most reliable manuscripts. Actually, the evidence for the two is slightly different. In the case of John 8:1-11 NONE of the very early manuscripts have this passage. Only WebThe Mark 16:9-20 Debate. Believe it or not, some Bible scholars believe that Mark 16:9-20 is not supposed to be a part of our Bibles! They say it was added…. I say God wanted it there… and it can be easily proven. This is a work of Satan to take apart God’s Word, and cause doubt and confusion. Let’s leave behind the confusion and doubt ...
Was Mark 16:9–20 Originally Part of Mark’s Gospel?
WebAnswer: Mark 16:9-20 is in the Bible, whether it belongs there is a matter of opinion. However, the overwhelming consensus of Biblical scholars is that the person who penned … http://livinggreeknt.org/findings/mark16-9-20.php herring \u0026 associates inc
Should Mark 16:9-20 be in the Bible?
WebMark 16:9-20 is not found in the Vaticanus and Sinaiticus (the oldest manuscripts, which are from the Alexandrian line). That explains why modern translations (from the Alexandrian … WebThe longer ending of Mark, which appears as Mark 16:9-20 in most translations, is believed to be spurious by many Bible translators and commentators today. Most modern translations footnote the passage, and the NIV 2011 prints the passage in italics, further indicating doubt as to its authenticity. The omission is supported by Aleph (4th ... Web1 day ago · The worst road team to win a title, the 1958 St. Louis Hawks, posted a .333 win percentage away from home. The 2024-23 Warriors were 11-30 on the road, good for a winning percentage of .268. Only ... herring type fish